1. We have moved from vBulletin to XenForo and you are viewing the site in the middle of the move. Though the functional aspect of everything is working fine, we are still working on other changes including the new design on Xenforo.
    Dismiss Notice

How the Google Penguin Update has affected SEO for writers

Discussion in 'Internet Marketing' started by vigorsolarr, Jun 16, 2012.

  1. vigorsolarr

    vigorsolarr New Member

    Google Penguin decreases the search engine rankings of sites that do now follow the Google Webmaster Guidelines. That is to say those sites that include black hat SEO along the lines of keyword stuffing, cloaking and duplicating content. Link quality are the buzz words of the Google Penguin update
     
  2. shabbir

    shabbir Administrator Staff Member

  3. Bertashton

    Bertashton Banned

    yep right vigorsolarr most of the website get hit by the this update, i think it was biggest changes have ever been seen by google. A Drastic change.
     
  4. ozsubasi

    ozsubasi New Member

    It is not correct to say " most of the website get hit". I think there is some reason to doubt Google's claim that it is only a small percent, but not that it is more than 50% of sites.
    All they have actually done is enforce what was in their guidelines anyway, so I don't know where "drastic" change comes from.
    My site was hit, but I think we still need to keep this in perspective.
     
  5. Bertashton

    Bertashton Banned

    i mean to say, it never happen before that any changes that made by a Google affects the 3% of the overall website... that's why i said its a biggest change of ever, dear ozsubasi is anyone of your website get hits the penguin update?
     
  6. ozsubasi

    ozsubasi New Member

    How many were hit by Panda? or by Caffeine, or Big Daddy? I don't think Google have published figures like these before so that comparisons, are not available, but if you have seen them please link to them so we can compare.
    But on the face of it, if 97% of sites were not affected then without supportive evidence I do not think you can describe the effects in the way that you have.
    In my reply to you I said:
     

Share This Page