A 4 letter word where Adding s at the end does not make it plural of the original word but a separate word
e.g.
ate adding G at the beginning makes it gate which is not anyway related to ate apart from spelling.
|
Invasive contributor
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,18:25 | #3 |
|
well found..lets see if anyone else has any other answer...
|
|
Invasive contributor
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,18:32 | #4 |
|
hate hates
|
|
Invasive contributor
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,18:33 | #5 |
|
ok ok i got it
mate mates |
|
~ Б0ЯИ Τ0 С0δЭ ~
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,18:35 | #6 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shabbir (1) HATE --> HATES, (2) LOVE --> LOVES etc ... ??? They are not plurals .. ![]() PS : I don't wanna change my answer.
|
|
Invasive contributor
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,18:37 | #7 |
|
he he
|
|
Mentor
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,21:47 | #8 |
|
Not easy finding a five letter word ending with S where the other 4 letters are not a noun...
Anyway here's one guess. HAVE and HAVES. The latter is used as a single noun meaning people with wealth: "the haves and the have nots". Also, HAVE is not used to mean a single person with wealth, you would say instead "he is one of the haves". 2nd person singular of HAVE is HAS. |
|
Mentor
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,21:56 | #9 |
|
One more guess and I'll leave it at that. BRAS and BRASS.
That's a better one - brass is completely unrelated to bras - I suppose you could make bras out of brass but I suspect the lady would not be too comfortable. I suspect the 2nd person form of 4 letter verbs is excluded by the example "ate adding G at the beginning makes it gate which is NOT ANYWAY RELATED to ate apart from spelling" (capitalisation added).
nimesh, SaswatPadhi
likes this
|
|
Invasive contributor
|
![]() |
| 19Aug2009,22:21 | #10 |
|
Ah....i couldn't thought of that...
nice one xp Lol
|






