There are many techniques in seo for getting backlinks. You can use directory submission, social bookmarking , forum posting , articles , blogs , videos and many techniques for getting more backlinks. But go for quality backlinks instead of quantity backlinks. Because quality backlinks provide more efficient and positive result for your site.
If your internal pages have some target keywords in content then you may link that keywords with related page to get more links from your own site.
Yeah! so many techniques to get more backlinks. Do link building techniques to get backlinks. Social bookmarking, Directory submission, article submission. Be sure that the submissions are good PR.
best way is to create a blog where you can discuss and create an article about your product. you can also place a link of your website
Hi, If you are talking about links from your own site then it is very simple, use keyword rich content and put hyperlinks on the keywords which redirect to your own website. And, if you are talking about links from other site then you can do all SEO techniques, SMO, PPC and web 2.0 for your site. As you have said that you are a beginner, I will suggest you to do a solid On-page SEO first then go for other processes.
Taking care of keyword stuffing is very important because their presence must be not more than 2-3% of the content present on the webpage. Also, keyword stuffing give weight-age to your site while any search hit those words. I hope this helps you to plan your strategy.
Where does that figure of 2-3% come from please? Is it just an opinion or can you link to the source of it?
Hi, I will provide you the source link also but don't want more infractions, thus telling only the name, I have read articles and participate in forums to get this figure. Alla re suggested the figure of 2-5 %. therefore, I put it here. I think, the information provided by the Google at top results is trust-able. Well, it is like that: 30 instances in the 900 words of article is 2%. I hope I satisfied you with this answer.
You will not (and have not) receive an infraction for giving a link to source that is relevant to the topic - especially as I asked you for one Sources are important because they are the difference between stating an opinion and stating an opinion that is supported. I have found the source you are referring to: http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/56076 and this is simply a discussion, not a source. A source is the origin of where something that is discussed comes from, for example a statement from Google. On the subject of keyword density, there is a video from Matt Cutts regarding keyword percentage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk4qgQdp2UA I don't believe everything that Mr Cutts says, especially when he is being deliberately vague. But in this he specifically says that there is no ideal percentage for keyword density and I would consider this to be an authoratitive source. Just because something is repeated often, it does not make it true. Regarding the "30 instances in the 900 words of article is 2%", that is 3.33% I believe.
But you will have to be very cautious. Isn't the techniques is kind of link wheel. I am confused in this.
And I am confused by your posting "Isn't the techniques is kind of link wheel" - which techniques are you referring to please?If someone says something you don't understand, it is a good idea to quote them in you post.
