I saw the article and It's on my *To read* list

I see your blog in blogspot and so have you read http://www.codeitwell.com/blogspot-vs-wordpress.html

ok.
But even then, almost 75% of the content will not be mine

If you post all the parts combined that can be considered as only part I is copied according to you

ok..
Will check If I can get something useful, only from the original content

Reference is where you have taken something from there and not where you have 75% of the complete content.

I agree but then the my whole motive is to provide with different options available, which everyone doesn't know.

And I don't think that wouldn't become a complete article If I posted only the original content.
It would be like a phrase and not a sentence.

And 1 more thing: If you don't want the content from original post, why there was a section for References

Yes I see that and it would be good if you post the original ones

Yeah, I thought that it can be a reason for rejection.

But I would like to point out that there are no screenshots in the original link.

If you see my blog http://techiethakkar.blogspot.com/search/label/Printing
There I have 4 parts which I was going to split into 2 articles and post.

What I posted was only the first part [which was unfortunately almost from the ref link]
If you see Part 3,4 from my blog, it's content is more original
Part 4 is completely original, If I remember correctly

Actually this was a mail that I sent to my whole office for the awareness, and also to save pages