Originally Posted by shabbir
Both the links say that he has commented on your articles and nothing more. What he has commented lets take one sample.
You have an article - Ankit Fadia - A Dirt in Nation (Part - 1) and that title says it all. If you write some article on me you should be expecting some comments of the sort he has commented on.
Yes ! that's true. If someone places such as title for me or you then definietly this reaction should have been seen by us to. But, here I will thank you and clear one point which is very. The article on which he commented first of all for the above discusses bad language(google group) was having the title of hacking + helping = solution and till that comment was posted by ankit fadia, I had no articles in my wikipedia account which were against ankit fadia or wikipedia. All the articles were created by me after this comment for the title you mentioned, i.e. 'Ankit Fadia - A Dirt in Nation'.
So, please take this clarity that first of all he commented badly on my educational article which was only and one article at that time posted on http://shriganesh.gather.com
accounts, whereas all other articles were in my self defense and which were created only after he started first against me in this way. Even he tried to spoil my reputation because you might not be knowing that when he commented this thing without any reason on my article with a bad intention of jealousy, the ranking of this article with keyword 'kalpesh sharma' on google was 2nd or 3rd. You are talking about I spoiled his reputation then what about my reputation and If same would have happened with you without any cause or reason by ankit fadia, then you too would have done same thing which I did. So, naturally there is nothing wrong I did in self defence.